View source for Copy editing

{{Short description|Improving the formatting, style, and accuracy of text}}
{{For|selfref=y|information about copy editing on Wikipedia|Wikipedia:Basic copyediting}}
[[File:Example of copyedited manuscript.jpg|thumb|Example of non-professional copy editing in progress<ref>The document is then published as: {{cite book |author=Phoebe Ayers |url=https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4sm4b8w2 |title="Wikipedia, User-Generated Content, and the Future of Reference Sources" in David A. Tyckoson, John G. Dove (eds). Reimagining Reference in the 21st Century. Purdue UP |date=November 11, 2014 |publisher=Purdue University Press |isbn=9781557536983 |access-date=January 7, 2019}}</ref>]]

'''Copy editing''' (also known as '''copyediting''' and '''manuscript editing''') is the process of revising written material ("[[copy (publishing)|copy]]") to improve quality and readability, as well as ensuring that a text is free of errors in grammar, style and accuracy.<ref name="What is copy editing">{{cite web |title=What Is Copy Editing? |url=http://www.sfep.org.uk/about/faqs/what-is-copyediting/ |access-date=March 25, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Stainton |first1=Elsie Myers |title=The Fine Art of Copyediting |date=2002 |publisher=Columbia University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wAeT5hN1XfAC |access-date=21 February 2017 |isbn=9780231124782}}</ref> ''[[The Chicago Manual of Style]]'' states that manuscript editing encompasses "simple mechanical corrections (mechanical editing) through sentence-level interventions (line, or stylistic, editing) to substantial remedial work on literary style and clarity, disorganized passages, baggy prose, muddled tables and figures, and the like (substantive editing)". In the context of print publication, copy editing is done before [[typesetting]] and again before [[proofreading]].<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|pp=1–5|date=April 2016}}<ref name="What is copy editing" /> Outside traditional book and journal publishing, the term "copy editing" is used more broadly, and is sometimes referred to as proofreading; the term sometimes encompasses additional tasks.

Although copy editors are generally expected to make simple revisions to smooth awkward passages, they do not have a license to rewrite a text line by line, nor do they prepare material on an author's behalf. (Creating original content to be published under another person's name is called "[[ghostwriting]]".) Furthermore, copy editors are expected to query structural and organizational problems, but they are not expected to fix these problems. In addition, copy editors do not normally engage in "[[developmental editing]]", which includes helping an author develop an idea into a publishable manuscript, overhauling a rough draft, identifying gaps in subject coverage, devising strategies for more-effective communication of content, and creating features to enhance the final product and make it more competitive in the marketplace.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Einsohn |first1=Amy |last2=Schwartz |first2=Marilyn |title=The Copyeditor's Handbook |date=2019 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Oakland, California |isbn=978-0-520-28672-6 |pages=5–14 |edition=4 }}</ref>

In the United States and Canada, an editor who does this work is called a '''copy editor'''. An organization's highest-ranking copy editor, or the supervising editor of a group of copy editors, may be known as the "copy chief", "copy desk chief", or "news editor". In the United Kingdom, the term "copy editor" is used, but in newspaper and magazine publishing, the term is '''subeditor''' (or "sub-editor"), commonly shortened to "sub".<ref>Lozano, George A. [https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2401 Ethics of Using Language Editing Services in an Era of Digital Communication and Heavily Multi-Authored Papers]. Retrieved 24 July 2014.</ref> In the context of the Internet, online ''copy'' refers to the textual content of [[web page]]s. Similar to print, online copy editing is the process of revising and preparing the raw or draft text of web pages for publication.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.sparkleweb.org/copy-editing-ux |title=What is Copy Editing? |website=Sparkle Web Digital Services |access-date=2016-05-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160528190011/http://www.sparkleweb.org/copy-editing-ux |archive-date=2016-05-28 |url-status=dead}}</ref>

Copy editing has three levels: light, medium, and heavy. Depending on the budget and scheduling of the publication, the publisher will let the copy editor know what level of editing to employ. The chosen type of editing will help the copy editor prioritize their efforts.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|p=12}}

== Practices ==
=== Mechanical editing ===
Mechanical editing is the process of closely reading a piece of writing for consistency, either internally or in accordance with the publisher's house style. According to Einsohn, mechanical editors work with such things as the following:<ref>{{cite book |last=Einsohn |first=Amy |title=The Copyeditor's Handbook: A Guide for Book Publishing and Corporate Communications, with Exercises and Answer Keys |year=2011 |publisher=University of California |location=Berkeley, California |isbn=978-0-520-27156-2 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hbMwDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA5 | quote= The heart of copyediting consists of making a manuscript conform to an ''editorial style'' (also called ''house style''). Editorial style includes: <br/> spelling <br/> hyphenation <br/> capitalization <br/> punctuation <br/> treatment of numbers and numerals <br/>treatment of quotations <br/> use of abbreviations and acronyms <br/> use of italics and bold type <br/> treatment of special elements (headings, lists, tables, charts, and graphs) <br/> format of footnotes or endnotes and other documentation. }}</ref>
* Abbreviations and acronyms
* Additional elements, such as charts, tables, and graphs
* Capitalization
* [[note (typography)|Footnotes and endnotes]]
* [[Syllabification|Hyphenation]]
* Italicization (appropriate use of [[emphasis (typography)|emphasis]] (italic or bold); appropriate choice of broad typeface category ([[italic type|italic]], [[roman type|roman]], other), especially in mathematical or scientific texts)
* Numbers and numerals
* Punctuation
* Quotations
* Spelling

Gilad also mentions the following:<ref>{{cite book |last=Gilad |first=Suzanne |title=Copyediting & Proofreading for Dummies |year=2007 |page=50 |publisher=Wiley |location=Hoboken, New Jersey |isbn=978-0-470-12171-9}}</ref>{{Request quotation|date=April 2016}}
* Initialisms
* Page numbers, headers, and footers
* Underscoring

Proper spelling and punctuation are subjective in some cases, where they must be left to the discretion of the copy editor or the publisher. Most publishing firms use a widely recognized [[style guide]] such as the ''[[New Oxford Style Manual]]'', ''[[The Chicago Manual of Style]]'' and ''[[List of style guides#Canada|The Canadian Style]]''. Companies that produce documents and reports but do not consider themselves publishers in the usual sense tend to rely on in-house style guides or on the judgment of the copy editor.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|5}}

=== Grammar and usage ===
The goal of the copy editor is to enforce inviolable rules while respecting personal stylistic preferences. This can be difficult, as some writers view grammatical corrections as a challenge to their intellectual ability or professional identity. Therefore, copy editors are encouraged to respect the author's preference if it is acceptable. This practice is complicated further by volatile language conventions as recorded by books on grammar and usage, the authors of which often disagree.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|333–337}}

=== Content editing ===
Content editing consists of reorganizing or restructuring a document. This involves any inconsistent parts of the content as well as any variances. Content editors can fix the content by either rewriting it or heavily editing it. The copy editor will often point out especially difficult passages to the author, who will resolve the issues.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|9}}

Although copy editors are not responsible for factual correctness of the document, they can provide comments for the author on any information that they know to be untrue,<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|9}} such as year discrepancies or misleading ideas. Such [[fact-checking]] is acceptable for copy editors who know the document's subject matter.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|7–10}}

The copy editor must also point out any biased language without infringing on the author's meaning. This includes material "that might form the basis for a lawsuit alleging libel, invasion of privacy, or obscenity". Some see censoring biased language as [[political correctness]], so it is important that the copy editor distinguish between the two.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|7–10}} To do this, the copy editor will permit intentional "politically incorrect" views and censor only marginalized, offensive, or exclusive language.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|405}}

=== Correlating parts, typecoding, and permissions ===
Most [[manuscript]]s will require the copy editor to correlate the parts within it. Copy editors must carry out the following tasks in this process:<ref name="einsohn2011">{{cite book |last=Einsohn |first=Amy |title=The Copyeditor's Handbook: A Guide for Book Publishing and Corporate Communications, with Exercises and Answer Keys |year=2011 |publisher=University of California |location=Berkeley, California |isbn=978-0-520-27156-2}}</ref>{{rp|7}}
* Verify any [[cross-reference]]s that appear in the text
* Check the numbering of footnotes, endnotes, tables, and illustrations
* Specify the placement of tables and illustrations
* Check the content of the illustrations against the captions and the text
* Read the list of illustrations against the illustrations and captions
* Read the [[table of contents]] against the manuscript
* Read the footnotes/endnotes and in-text citations against the [[bibliography]]
* Check the alphabetization of the bibliography or reference list
 
Some manuscripts may require special cross-checking. For example, in a how-to text, a copy editor might need to verify that the list of equipment or parts matches the instructions given within the text.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|7}}
 
Typecoding is the process of identifying which sections of the manuscript are not regular running text. These portions of text, known as elements, include the following:<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|10}}
* Part and chapter numbers
* Titles and subtitles
* Headings and subheadings
* Lists
* Extracts
* Displayed equations
* Table numbers
* Source lines
* Footnotes
* Figure numbers and captions

It is the copy editor's job to typecode (or make note of) all manuscript elements for the publication designer.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20160508130210/http://www.cyranoworks.com/documents/Editinglevels.pdf Cyranoworks.com]</ref> Hard-copy copy editors are usually asked to pencil in the type codes in the left margin of the manuscript. On-screen copy editors may be asked to insert type codes at the beginning and end of each element.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|10}}

Finally, if the manuscript contains long quotations from a published work that is still under [[copyright]], the copy editor should remind the author to acquire permission to [[reprint]] those quotations. The same goes for the reprinting of tables, charts, graphs, and illustrations that have appeared in print. Rules vary for the reproduction of unpublished materials (letters, diaries, etc.)<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|10}}

== Processes ==
There are basic procedures that every copy editor must follow: copy editors need a system for marking changes to the author's text (marking), a process for querying the author and the editorial coordinator ([[question|querying]]), a method for keeping track of editorial decisions (recordkeeping), and procedures for incorporating the author's review of the copyediting into a final document (cleanup). These systems were originally developed in an era before that of the computer, but over time these procedures were adapted for a digital on-screen space.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|7–10}}

Each medium (in print and on screen) has its own affordances, and although a copy editor may prefer one editing process over the other, copy editors are practically required to use both techniques.

=== Hard-copy editing ===
Traditional markup copyediting, or hard-copy editing, is still important because screening tests for employment may be administered in hard copy. Also, the author whose text the copy editor is editing may prefer hard-copy markup, and copy editors need to know traditional markup in case documents and materials cannot be exchanged electronically. When editing in hard copy, all participating parties (the editor, author, typesetter, and proofreader) must understand the marks the copy editor makes, and therefore a universal marking system that signifies these changes exists. This is also why the copy editor should write legibly and neatly. Copy editors working hard copy write their corrections in the text directly, leaving the margins for querying. Usually, the copy editor is asked to write in a bright color so that the author and other parties can easily recognize the editor's changes.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|7–10}}

=== On-screen editing ===
Every year, more editing projects are being done on computers and fewer in print. Also, if there is a digital version of a text that the copy editor is editing, the latter can more easily search words, run [[spell checker]]s, and generate clean copies of messy pages. The first thing copy editors must do when editing on screen is to copy the author's files, as the original document must be preserved.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|7–10}} Each [[word processor|word-processing program]] provides various options for how an editor's markups are shown on screen and on the printout. On-screen editing mainly differs from hard-copy editing in the fact that the copy editor should edit more cleanly on screen, refraining from saving parts of words, and be careful in maintaining proper [[leading|line spacing]].<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|7–10}}

=== Querying ===
Copy editors often need to query their authors in order to address questions, comments, or explanations: most of these can be done in the margins of the text, or the comment section when on screen.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|7–10}} The copy editor must consider when to query and the length and tone of their queries, as querying too often or seldom, cryptically, or sarcastically can result in a negative relationship between the copy editor and the author.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|7–10}}

== Goals ==
A copy editor's goals may change, depending on the publication for which they work; however, there are a few constituencies that must always be served – the author (the person who wrote or compiled the manuscript), the publisher (the person or company that pays for production), and the readers (the audience for whom the material is being produced). These parties (together with the copy editor) work to achieve the same goal, namely, to produce an error-free publication and improve the reader experience by reducing extraneous cognitive load.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.jfpeditorial.com/what-are-the-different-types-of-editing/|title = Types of editing: What are the three core levels? – Jo Finchen-Parsons Editorial|date = 29 April 2020}}</ref> The copy editor strives to improve clarity, coherence, consistency, and correctness – otherwise known as the "4 Cs", each of which serves the copy editor's "cardinal C", which is communication.<ref name="einsohn2011" />{{rp|3}}

== History ==
The biggest difference between monastic copyists and copy editors is that copy editors leave edits as suggestions that can be rejected by the writer. These printing houses established procedures for editing, preparing the text, and proofreading the first typeset [[galley proof]]s. Specialist correctors ensured that texts followed the standards of the time.<ref>Hellinga, Lotte (2009). ''The Gutenberg Revolutions A Companion to the History of the Book'', p. 211. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. {{ISBN|9781405192781}}.</ref>

Before the printing press, monastic copyists altered words or phrases they thought were odd, under the assumption that the copyist before them had made a mistake. This is what led to so much variety in standard texts like the Bible.{{Citation needed|date=June 2022}}

After the globalization of the [[book]] from 1800 to 1970 came the rise of American writers and editors. One editor in particular, [[Maxwell Perkins]], was sought out by writers such as Fitzgerald, Hemingway, and Wolfe because he greatly improved the work of these prominent authors with his editorial eye. Perkins was known for editing, guiding, and befriending his writers – but the times were changing.<ref name="Luey, Beth 2009 p. 369">Luey, Beth (2009). ''Modernity and Print III: The United States 1890-1970 A Companion to the History of the Book'', p. 369. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. {{ISBN|9781405192781}}.</ref>

In the late 19th century, the role of an editor was to decide if a manuscript was good enough to be published. As time passed, the role of an editor and [[publisher]] became more distant. Although there was a newfound relationship between editors and authors, thoughtful editing did not end.<ref name="Luey, Beth 2009 p. 369"/>

Copy editors were employed at various publishing houses, magazines, journals, and by private authors seeking revisions to their work. Some copy editors were even employed by [[public relations]] and [[advertising]] firms who valued strong editing practices in their business.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Harrigan|first1=Jane R.|last2=Dunlap|first2=Karen Brown|title=The Editorial Eye|date=2003|publisher=Bedford/St. Martin's|isbn=9780312152703|page=387|edition= Second}}</ref>

The symbols used by copy editors today are based on those that have been used by proofreaders since the beginnings of publishing, though they have undergone some changes over time. However, the exact beginnings of the copyediting language used today are unclear. Despite its long history, copyediting as a practice has not experienced any extreme upheaval other than the desktop publishing revolution of the 1980s. This phenomenon began as the result of a series of inventions that were released during the middle of this decade, and refers to the growth of technology usage in the field of copyediting.<ref name="History Design.">{{cite web |url=http://www.designtalkboard.com/design-articles/desktoppublishing.php |title=History of Desktop Publishing |publisher=DesignTalk |access-date= March 19, 2016}}</ref><ref name="Book Publishing.">
{{cite web |url=http://www.bookediting.ca/timeline.html |title=Book Editing Looks at Developments in the History of Book Printing and Publishing |publisher=The Authors Guild |access-date=March 19, 2016}}</ref> Namely, the development of the [[Xerox Star]] computer, with its [[Viewpoint desktop environment]] and the [[Xerox Character Code Standard|Xerox multilingual character code]] (the precursor of [[Unicode]]); as well as others, such as the [[Mac (computer)|Macintosh]] computer, the [[HP LaserJet|desktop laser printer]] by Hewlett-Packard, and software for desktop publishing called [[PageMaker]] allowed the revolution to begin.<ref name="History Design." /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3401200365.html |title=Desktop Publishing |author= Allen Renear |publisher= The Gale Group Inc. |year=2002 |access-date= March 19, 2016}}</ref> By allowing both individuals and publishing agencies alike to cheaply and effectively begin to edit compositions entirely on-screen rather than by hand, desktop publishing revolution morphed copyediting into the practice it is today. Most copy editors today rely on more modern [[WYSIWYG]] (what you see is what you get) text processors such as Microsoft Word that are based on the original PageMaker to do their work.

There were a few events that led to changes within copyediting as a career. One of these, the successful strike of the editorial department of the ''Newark Ledger'' from November 17, 1934, to March 28, 1935, was "the first major action of its kind by any local guild ... [it] both confirmed the irreversibility of the guilds' movement away from the professional association idea and greatly accelerated that process".<ref name="Toward Unionization: The American Newspaper Guild and the Newark Ledger Strike of 1934–35.">{{cite journal |title=Toward Unionization: The American Newspaper Guild and the Newark Ledger Strike of 1934-35 |journal = Labor History|volume = 11|pages = 3–22|author=Daniel J. Leab |publisher=Tamiment Institute |doi = 10.1080/00236567008584104|year = 1970}}</ref> Paired with another string of strikes led by The New York Newspaper Guild against a number of smaller newspapers in the summer of 1934, these actions served to shift the image of the editorial worker as a "professional" to one as an average citizen.<ref name="Toward Unionization: The American Newspaper Guild and the Newark Ledger Strike of 1934–35." /> Another strike from the year 1934 was the strike at the Macaulay Company, reportedly the first-ever strike to occur at a publishing firm. At the conclusion of the second Macaulay strike, which occurred three months after the first, the nationwide drive towards unionization had entered the publishing industry and was "sweeping through all the major publishing houses".<ref name="Women Writers in the United States: A Timeline of Literary, Cultural, and Social History">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Yqi0x7BEvCoC&q=macaulay+newspaper+strike+1934&pg=PA251 |title=Women Writers in the United States: A Timeline of Literary, Cultural, and Social History |author=Cynthia J. Davis, Kathryn West |publisher=Oxford UP |year= 2006 |access-date=March 19, 2016|isbn=9780195358124 }}</ref> As these events seemed to have the secondary result of lowering the status of editors across the various publishing fields, it could be said{{Weasel inline|date=June 2023}} that they sparked the decline of copy editors, which can be seen across the publishing fields today.
 
Owing to the rise of the [[Digital Age]], the roles and responsibilities of a copy editor have changed. For instance, beginning in 1990, copy editors learned pagination electronically.<ref name="digital age">{{cite thesis |last=Avery-Ahlijian|first=Angela Anne. |date=2011|title=Copy Editing in the Digital Age: How Technology Has Changed Copy Editing |publisher=Eastern Michigan University |url=http://commons.emich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1252&context=honors |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230908075907/https://commons.emich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1252&context=honors |archive-date= Sep 8, 2023 }}</ref>{{Page needed|date=April 2016}} They could now look at multiple pages of a text on multiple screens and easily make their edits in that environment, as opposed to pasting physical paper cut-outs onto a board by hand. This technological advance also required that copy editors learn new software such as [[Adobe InDesign]], [[QuarkXPress]], [[Affinity Publisher]] or [[Scribus]].

Modern copy editors are often required to edit for digital as well as print versions of the text. Digital copyediting requires copy editors to understand [[RSS feed]]s, [[social media]] (such as Twitter and Facebook), and [[HyperText Markup Language|HTML]].<ref name="digital age" /> What should be accounted for is that, in this digital age, information is constantly being released, which has led to a decline in the editing of the online versions. Editors of the website [[BuzzFeed]] commented that sometimes they "simply can't get [to] every post before it's published".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ajr.org/2014/05/13/copy-editors-digital-media/ |title=Copy Editors Carve Niche in Digital Media Landscape |author= Dan Appenfeller |date= May 13, 2014}}</ref>
While copy editors still do traditional tasks such as checking facts, grammar, style, and writing headlines, some of their duties have been pushed aside to make way for technology. Some copy editors now have to design page layouts and some even edit video content. Copy editors are now sometimes referred to as "copy/layout editors" or "producers/designers".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.copydesk.org/blog/2013/06/01/editing-job-losses/ |title=A look at the numbers: Editing job losses in the newsroom |author=Fred Vultee |date=June 1, 2013 |access-date=April 19, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160809022924/http://www.copydesk.org/blog/2013/06/01/editing-job-losses/ |archive-date=August 9, 2016 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</ref>

== Changes in the field ==
Traditionally, the copy editor would read a [[printing|printed]] or written manuscript, manually marking it with editor's "[[List of proofreader's marks|correction marks]]". At sizable newspapers, the main copy desk was often U-shaped; the copy desk chief sat in the "slot" (the center space of the U) and was known as the "slot man", while copy editors were arrayed around him or her on the outside of the U, known as the "rim".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theslot.com/slotman.html |title=What's a slot man? |author=Bill Walsh |work=The Slot |access-date=July 28, 2014}}</ref> In the past, copy editors were sometimes known humorously as "rim rats". Chief copy editors are still sometimes called "the slot".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/26/AR2007102601865.html |title=The Power and Perils of Headlines |author=Deborah Howell |date=October 28, 2007 |newspaper=The Washington Post |access-date=July 28, 2014}}</ref> But nowadays, the manuscript is more often read on a [[computer display]] and text corrections are entered directly.

The nearly universal adoption of computerized systems for editing and layout in newspapers and magazines has also led copy editors to become more involved in the design and the technicalities of production. Technical knowledge is therefore sometimes considered as important as writing ability, though this is truer in journalism than it is in [[book publishing]]. Hank Glamann, the co-founder of the [[American Copy Editors Society]], made the following observation about ads for copy editor positions at American newspapers:
<blockquote>We want them to be skilled grammarians and wordsmiths and write bright and engaging headlines and must know Quark. But, often, when push comes to shove, we will let every single one of those requirements slide except the last one because you have to know that in order to push the button at the appointed time.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.asne.org/index.cfm?ID=3836 |title=Workshop: Keeping your copy editors happy |access-date=2 January 2009 |date=7 August 2002 |publisher=The American Society of Newspaper Editors |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060207193451/http://www.asne.org/index.cfm?ID=3836 |archive-date=7 February 2006}}</ref></blockquote>

==Traits, skills, and training==
Besides an outstanding command of the language, copy editors need broad general knowledge for spotting factual errors; good critical thinking skills in order to recognize inconsistencies or vagueness; interpersonal skills for dealing with writers, other editors, and designers; attention to detail; and a sense of style. They must also set priorities and balance a desire for perfection with the need to meet deadlines.

Many copy editors have a college degree, often in journalism, communications, or the language of the writing that they edit. Additionally, some copy editors take it upon themselves to gain a background in topics that would further help their career. For instance, some copy editors may seek knowledge and background in statistics to help catch mistakes related to data within an article to help authors have a better chance at getting published.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last=Fonseca |first=Marisha |date=May 2013 |title="Does an academic copy-editor require knowledge of statistics?" |url=https://ease.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/essay_statistics.pdf |journal=European Science Editing |pages=46 |via=Essay Statistics}}</ref> Statistics are an aspect of copy editing that may be helpful to understanding a broader range of topics. Understanding how to read and interpret data allows copy editors to more accurately help authors which allows them to have a greater chance of publishing their work.<ref name=":1" /> According to Marisha Fonseca, who wrote a study on the correlation between understanding statistics in copy-editing, there are many articles that contain statistical flaws. Although a background in statistics is not necessary to become a copy editor, the training and background in understanding quantitative data can allow copy editors to further prevent inaccuracies in data related works. 

In the United States, copy editing is often taught as a college journalism course, though its name varies. The courses often include news design and [[pagination]].

In the United States, The Dow Jones Newspaper Fund sponsors internships that include two weeks of training. Also, the [[American Press Institute]], the [[Poynter Institute]], the [[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]], UC San Diego Extension, and conferences of the American Copy Editors Society offer mid-career training for newspaper copy editors and news editors (news copy desk supervisors).

Most US newspapers and publishers give copy-editing job candidates an editing test or a tryout. These vary widely and can include general items such as acronyms, current events, math, punctuation, and skills such as the use of [[AP Stylebook|Associated Press style]], headline writing, infographics editing, and [[journalism ethics and standards|journalism ethics]].

Copy editors can also be trained in other software programs to ensure accuracy within a writer's work. Whether using programs like illustrator, publisher, or photoshop, copy editors can obtain skills in using different types of software to help catch further errors that may be present in a writer's work. Due to new developments in technology and its various uses, the training and skills that would help a copy editor are expected to change in the future.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Loop |first=Mead |date=2000 |title=Contemporary editing. |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/215293721 |journal=Journalism & Mass Communication Educator |volume=55 |issue=3 |pages=90–91 |id={{ProQuest|215293721}} |via=ProQuest}}</ref>

== Differentiating from other forms of editing ==
Copy editing is an important step in the editing process. It is useful to differentiate it from other forms of editing to understand its unique role and significance.
===Vs. substantive editing===
* Copy editing: This process focuses on the clarity, accuracy, consistency, and overall readability of the text. It involves checking for grammatical errors, punctuation mistakes, inconsistencies in style and formatting (and compliance with [[Style guide|house style]]), and ensuring that the text flows smoothly. The primary goal is to polish the content without altering its core message.
* Substantive editing: Also known as structural or developmental editing, substantive editing delves deeper into the content's structure and organization. It addresses issues like pacing, plot development in fiction, argument strength in non-fiction, and overall content organization. This form of editing may involve reordering sections, suggesting additional content, or recommending deletions.<ref>{{Cite web |title=How to Copy Edit: A Guide to Copy Editing Everything |website=MasterClass |url=https://www.masterclass.com/articles/a-guide-to-copy-editing-everything}}</ref>
===Vs. proofreading===
* Copy editing: As mentioned, copy editing focuses on improving the content's clarity, coherence, and consistency. It ensures that the text adheres to a particular style guide and is free from factual errors.
* Proofreading: This is the final step in the editing process. Proofreading involves checking the text for typographical errors, missed grammatical mistakes, and formatting inconsistencies. It is the last line of defense before the content is published, and attempts to ensure that no minor errors slip through.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-09-06 |title=Copy Editing vs. Proofreading: What's the Difference? |url=https://www.grammarly.com/blog/whats-the-difference-between-copy-editing-and-proofreading/ |access-date=2023-10-18 |website=Grammarly |first1=Jennifer |last1=Calonia |language=en}}</ref>
===Vs. line editing===
* Copy editing: This form of editing looks at the text from a broader perspective, ensuring consistency in style, tone, and voice. It also checks for factual accuracy and potential legal issues.
* Line editing: Line editing is a more in-depth review of each line in the manuscript. It focuses on the creative content, writing style, and language use at the sentence and paragraph level. The goal is to enhance the prose, making it clear and engaging.

Understanding these distinctions is useful for authors, publishers, and editors to ensure that each piece of content undergoes the appropriate level of scrutiny and refinement before reaching its audience.

== Contemporary ==
{{update section|reason=most of the information in this section is more than ten years old. In addition, it could use some material on AI-assisted copy editing|date=October 2023}}
Before the digital era, copy editors would mark errors and inconsistencies with a red pen, using a markup language of symbols which were universally known. The traditional copy editor was once defined as editing for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and other mechanics of style.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.editors.ca/hire/definitions.html |title=Definitions of editorial skills |date=12 December 2009 |access-date=5 April 2016|publisher=Editors' Association of Canada }}</ref>

Copy-editing symbols cannot be used in digital editing because they are not supported by tools such as track changes. With more posting online and less printing on paper, hard-copy can no longer keep pace with digital publishing.<ref name="digital age"/> For a publisher to hire copy editors to print a hard copy, make edits, and then make changes is no longer the most efficient process. The position of copy editors is at risk because software can correct grammatical errors more quickly<ref name="American Journalism Review">{{Cite web |url=http://ajr.org/2014/04/15/copy-editors-in-digital-world/ |first1=Michael |last1=King | title=Will Automated Copy Editors Replace Human Ones? | access-date=5 April 2016|date= 14 April 2014 |publisher=American Journalism Review |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160408195923/http://ajr.org/2014/04/15/copy-editors-in-digital-world/ |archive-date= Apr 8, 2016 }}</ref> and cheaply.

Professionals feared that the introduction of digital editing software would end copyediting careers. Copy editors are still employed and needed for heavy edits, such as fact-checking and content organization, which are beyond the abilities of the software. With [[grammar checker|grammar software]] and journalists who can edit, copy editors are seen as a luxury in publishing.<ref name="American Journalism Review"/> The potential for a company to use editing software may also require the copy editor to only perform heavy editing and querying. Though the steps for copyediting are the same, the execution has been adapted for digital environments.

The technological development of [[cloud storage]] allows contemporary copy editors and writers to upload and share files across multiple devices.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.coolheadtech.com/blog/four-differences-between-google-drive-and-dropbox |first1=Christopher |last1=Alghini | title=Four Differences Between Google Drive and Dropbox |access-date=5 April 2016|date= 23 October 2013 |publisher=Coolhead Tech |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160414024721/http://www.coolheadtech.com/blog/four-differences-between-google-drive-and-dropbox |archive-date= Apr 14, 2016 }}</ref> Online word processors allow users to perform a number of tasks. Each processor has its advantages and disadvantages based on the users' preferences, but primarily allows users to share, edit and collaborate on documents.<ref name="Make Use Of">{{Cite web |url=http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/5-great-alternatives-to-google-docs-you-should-consider/ | title= 5 Great Alternatives to Google Docs You Should Consider |access-date=5 April 2016|date= 26 October 2009 |publisher=Make Use Of |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160419154630/http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/5-great-alternatives-to-google-docs-you-should-consider/ |archive-date= Apr 19, 2016 }}</ref> Additionally, Google Docs users can invite others via email to view, comment, and edit any file of their choosing, and those who were invited can view and edit the document together in real time.<ref name="Google">{{Cite web |url=https://support.google.com/docs/answer/49008?hl=en |title=Overview of Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides |website=Google Help |access-date=5 April 2016 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160427151649/https://support.google.com/docs/answer/49008?hl=en |archive-date= Apr 27, 2016 }}</ref> Unlike Google Docs whose files can only be shared through the web app, Dropbox shares from a desktop app.<ref name="digital age"/><ref name="Google"/> Dropbox users can share documents as links or as shared folders.<ref name="Make Use Of"/> Users can create shared folders and add others to the folder.<ref name="Make Use Of"/> Files in a shared folder will appear in the other user's Dropbox and all involved users receive notifications when edits are made to a file in the folder.<ref name="Make Use Of"/> Adobe's Buzzword allows users to share files, with the user's choice from varying levels of editing access and includes a version history feature which tracks changes made to documents and lets users revert to earlier versions.<ref name="Google"/> 
Useful in many word processors, a track changes feature allows users to make changes to a document and view them separately from the original document. In Microsoft Word, users can choose whether to show or hide changes by clicking track changes under the Review ribbon.<ref name="Track changes">{{Cite web |url=https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/track-changes-in-word-197ba630-0f5f-4a8e-9a77-3712475e806a |title=Track changes in Word |publisher=[[Microsoft]] Support |access-date=18 October 2023 }}  </ref> Those editing documents can leave comments by clicking wherever the user desires to leave a comment and clicking New Comment under the review ribbon or by highlighting text and clicking New Comment.<ref name="Track changes"/> Users can apply revisions and choose which level of markups to view under the Show Markup dropdown menu in the Review ribbon.<ref name="Track changes"/> Users can also choose to accept or reject changes by clicking either Accept or Reject in the Review Ribbon.<ref name="Track changes"/>

=== Contemporary copy editor ===
The field of copy editing is not obsolete. Teresa Schmedding, president of the American Copy Editors Society (ACES) and a deputy managing editor at the ''Daily Herald'' in Chicago, thinks that copy editors are "a natural fit" for digital journalism and social media because, though publishing has been made available to almost anyone, quality and credibility is brought to content only by copy editors.<ref name="Track changes"/>

Copy editors must now consider multimedia aspects of the story, such as video, images, audio, and [[search engine optimization]], which may be included in digital publications.<ref name="Track changes"/> Digital editing now requires copy editors to understand [[search engine optimization|SEO]], HTML, [[Cascading Style Sheets|CSS]], and [[RSS]] feeds,<ref name="Track changes"/> as well as creative tools like [[Adobe Illustrator]]. This shows that the age of copy editing has now surpassed traditional methods of editing. The basics of checking grammar and punctuation are still necessary, but in the age of technology, the field of copy-editing has grown to include digital editing of various forms of media.<ref name="Track changes" /> Contemporary copy editors now have to review and understand current technology to help authors gain credibility in today's digital age. 

=== Issues ===
One of the problems with copy-editing is that it may slow the publication of the text. With the digital publishing era came an increased demand for a fast turnover of information. Additional details such as color printing, page size, and layout are determined by the allotted budget.<ref name=":0" /> Web-based publications, such as BuzzFeed and ''[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]]'', do not have enough room in their budgets to keep sufficient staff to edit their massive, daily rushes of content. Therefore copy chief Emmy Favila says lower-priority posts are published without copyedits at Buzzfeed.<ref name="ajr.org">{{Cite web |url=http://ajr.org/2014/05/13/copy-editors-digital-media/ |title= Copy Editors Carve Niche in Digital Media Landscape |access-date=5 April 2016|date= 13 May 2014|publisher=American Journalism Review }}</ref> ''Slate'' does not edit its blog posts before publication, but all of its news articles are copy edited before publication, say ''Slate'' copy chief Lowen Liu and deputy editor Julia Turner.<ref name="ajr.org" />

In response to such high demands for fast-produced content, some online publications have started publishing articles first and then editing later, a process known as back-editing. Editors prioritize stories to edit based on traffic and whether the content was originally reported for needing edits.

Reading material has become increasingly accessible to users with a wide range of disabilities. Carolyn Rude exemplifies such cases in alternatively replacing illustrations with text and audio translations for the visually impaired.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=Technical editing|last1=Rude|first1=Carolyn D.|date=2006|publisher=Longman|last2=Dayton|first2=David|last3=Maylath|first3= Bruce|isbn=032133082X|edition= 4th|location=New York|oclc=60188071}}</ref> Rude also suggests that web developers attempt to stick to print guidelines, such as "clear and simple language and consistent terms and navigation devices", especially when readers are looking at text in a second language.<ref name=":0"/>

== Effects of the internet==

According to a 2011 publication by [[Angela Anne Avery-Ahlijian]], as online resources rise in popularity, copy editors endeavor to meet the increase in digital consumption to the best of their abilities, and such high competition has resulted in a gradual "declining of quality in editing", such as copy editing or fact-checking.<ref name="digital age" /> However, this does not mean that the internet has limited the scope of a copy editor's responsibilities or job opportunities. One of the most important advancements of the digital age is the advent of pagination, which gives copy editors more control over the construction and revisions of their content, and is a convenient feature in modern software. Despite the increasing number of programs, however, some copy editors believe their basic functions and duties have not changed much. Other copy editors think that the Internet has simplified fact-checking and that websites such as Facebook or Twitter have aided information-gathering. Other digital skills, such as image selection and search engine optimization, increase the visibility of search results, especially when searching for keywords in headlines.

According to Avery-Ahlijian, in all likelihood the internet will continue to evolve, but this should not diminish the overall importance of copy editing. Although it may be tempting to neglect proper revisions in favor of convenience, the credibility and quality of an editor's work should still be maintained, as there will always be updates in software and technology.<ref name="digital age" /> As formats evolve, so too will the opportunities for journalists and other writers.

== See also ==
{{div col|colwidth=30em}}
* {{annotated link|ACES: The Society for Editing}}
** {{annotated link|Robinson Prize}}
* {{annotated link|Author editing}}
* {{annotated link|Headline}}
* {{annotated link|List of American copy editors}}
* {{annotated link|News design}}
* {{annotated link|Photo caption}}
* {{annotated link|Proofreading}}
* {{annotated link|Style guide}}
** {{annotated link|AP Stylebook}}
** {{annotated link|New Oxford Style Manual}}
** {{annotated link|The Chicago Manual of Style}}
** {{annotated link|Oxford English Corpus}}

{{div col end}}

== Notes ==
{{Reflist|30em}}

== References ==
* Anderson, Laura. ''McGraw-Hill's Proofreading Handbook'', 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.
* Baskette, Floyd K., Jack Z. Sissors, & Brian S. Brooks. ''The Art of Editing'', 8th edn. Allyn & Bacon, 2004.
** Rewritten and updated: Brian S. Brooks and James L. Pinson. ''The Art of Editing in the Age of Convergence'', 11th edn. Routledge, 2017.
* {{cite book |last1=Butcher |first1=Judith |last2=Drake |first2=Caroline |last3=Leach |first3=Maureen |title=Butcher's Copy-editing: The Cambridge Handbook for Editors, Copy-editors and Proofreaders |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LT1r8VE4E80C&q=%22Butcher's+Copy-editing%22+leach&pg=PP1 |place=Cambridge |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |year=2006 |edition= 4th |isbn=978-0-521-84713-1 |access-date=18 September 2012 }}
* Einsohn, Amy & Marilyn Schwartz. ''The Copyeditor's Handbook: A Guide for Book Publishing and Corporate Communications'', 4th edn. Oakland, Cal.: University of California Press, 2019.
* {{cite book | author=Ginna, Peter | title=What Editors Do: The Art, Craft and Business of Book Editing | publisher=The University of Chicago Press | location=Chicago | year=2017 | isbn=978-0-226-29983-9 }}
* Judd, Karen. ''Copyediting: A Practical Guide'', 3rd edn. Menlo Park, Cal.: Crisp Learning, 2001.
* Myers Stainton, Elsie. ''The Fine Art of Copyediting'', 2nd edn. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.
* Norton, Scott. ''Developmental Editing: A Handbook for Freelancers, Authors, and Publishers''. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
* Ó Brógáin, Séamas. ''A Dictionary of Editing''. Dublin: Claritas, 2015. {{ISBN|978-0-9934649-0-4}}.
* Rude, Carolyn D. & Angela Eaton. ''Technical editing'', 5th edn. Boston: Longman, 2010. {{ISBN|032133082X}}. OCLC 60188071.
* Saller, Carol Fisher. ''The Subversive Copy Editor: Advice from Chicago (or, How to Negotiate Good Relationships with Your Writers, Your Colleagues, and Yourself)''. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
* Amy J. Schneider. ''The Chicago guide to copyediting fiction''. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2023.
* Smith, Peggy. ''Mark My Words: Instruction and Practice in Proofreading'', 3rd edn. Alexandria, VA: EEI Press, 1997.
* Stroughton, Mary. ''The Copyeditor's Guide to Substance and Style'', 3rd edn. Alexandria, VA: EEI Press, 2006.

{{Commons category}}
{{Wiktionary}}

{{Journalism roles}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Copy editing| ]]
[[Category:Technical communication]]
[[Category:Writing occupations]]
[[Category:Journalism occupations]]
[[Category:Editors by type]]