English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick

English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/February

< English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals‎ | Archive

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by imported>Pegship at 21:09, 18 November 2020 (Moving from Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals to Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2015 using Cat-a-lot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
  __ARCHIVEDTALK__

Proposals, February 2015

American sports team stubs by state and sport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating:

along with individual stub tags for each state+DC (standard stub tag names for states), and categories where at least 60 stubs are present; and similar structures for individual sports (the intersection of the regional sport stubs cateogries and the top-level sports teams stubs categories would suggest that each of baseball, basketball and soccer would be viable on the regional level). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 23:07, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Arctiini stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The former Ctenuchinae have been split with the recategorization of the Arctiidae and lower taxa. The former three tribes have been split into two subtribes and one tribe. Propose creating all three templates, and categories where enough articles can be found.

Dawynn (talk) 11:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Detroit, Michigan stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating:

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 22:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Spilomelinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose genus-level splits for the larger genera under Spilomelinae. This will not bring the Spilomelinae back under the 800 threshold, but will pull out about 45% of the articles. I intend to build permanent categories for these genera while I'm building the stub categories.:

(Article counts are estimated.) Dawynn (talk) 13:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Support Go ahead. Gug01 (talk) 13:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Operating system stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
I Propose the stub:

The Man Of Companys... — Preceding unsigned comment added by CompanyDude (talk • contribs) 16:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

@CompanyDude: Please give examples of articles that the proposed stub template would be suitable for. About 20 will do for now, although you should really give at least 60. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
I take it this is a hoax. I see no main article or permanent category. Even a Google search came up dry. Dawynn (talk) 00:37, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:San Jose, California stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following:

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:St. Louis, Missouri stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating:

Note that the stub tags will be named according to the geo-stub tag mentioned here, after this CfD discussion is closed. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Support Since no one objected, I'll close the review. Gug01 (talk) 15:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:American philatelist stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy proposal. To pick up {{US-philatelist-stub}}. 60 pages. Dawynn (talk) 11:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Sacramento, California stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating Category:Sacramento, California stubs/{{SacramentoCA-sport-stub}} - We have at least these 105 stubs for the category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Go ahead, please create the category. Gug01 (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Miami, Florida stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following:

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Pakistani election stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose splitting this oversized category according to the major divisions of the country. Propose all of the following templates, and as many of the categories as we have at 60 articles for:

  • {{PunjabPK-election-stub}} / Category:Punjab, Pakistan election stubs
  • {{Sindh-election-stub}} / Category:Sindh election stubs
  • {{KhyberPakhtunkhwa-election-stub}} / Category:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa election stubs
  • {{Balochistan-election-stub}} / Category:Balochistan (Pakistan) election stubs
  • {{IslamabadTerritory-election-stub}} / Category:Islamabad Capital Territory election stubs
  • {{FATA-election-stub}} / Category:Federally Administered Tribal Areas election stubs
  • {{AzadKashmir-election-stub}} / Category:Azad Kashmir election stubs
  • {{GilgitBaltistan-election-stub}} / Category:Gilgit–Baltistan election stubs

Dawynn (talk) 02:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Since the main culprit here is the constituencies, not the elections themselves, I'm switching all of these to constituencies. This will also allow the stub categories to align with permanent categories.
Dawynn (talk) 12:30, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Greek railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose Category:Greek railway station stubs for the existing {{Greece-railstation-stub}} - speedy S1 proposal as the stub template has 74 transclusions now that I stub-sorted about 30 stations that previously had {{Europe-rail-transport-stub}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Little Rock, Arkansas stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating Category:Little Rock, Arkansas stubs/{{LittleRockAR-stub}} - after going through a scan, I got around 80 stubs for this category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 22:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Archipini stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This will not remove the parent category from the oversized category, but this will help whittle it down. Propose the following genera-based templates and categories:

Dawynn (talk) 18:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Go ahead. Do it. Gug01 (talk) 23:58, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:American film biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently oversized, the template {{US-audio-engineer-stub}} has more than 60 uses and this will grow once I finish checking, should get the parent under 800 so I propose Category:American audio engineer stubs. Waacstats (talk) 07:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Very well. I think you should create the category. Go ahead and create it. Gug01 (talk) 23:59, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://enwiki.freddythechick.net/index.php?title=English_Wikipedia_@_Freddythechick:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/February&oldid=1825658"