Active reviews for intermediate designs

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by imported>Sauer202 at 16:36, 1 February 2022 (Sauer202 moved page ARID to Active reviews for intermediate designs: Full page name). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (August 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In software engineering, active reviews for intermediate designs (ARID) is a method to evaluate software architectures, especially on an intermediate level, i.e. for non-finished architectures.^[1] It combines aspects from scenario-based design review techniques, such as the architecture tradeoff analysis method (ATAM) and the software architecture analysis method (SAAM), as well as active design reviews (ADR).^[2]

See also

Architectural analytics

References

^ Active reviews of intermediate designs (ARID) - Software Architect's Handbook [Book]
^ Clements, Paul; Kazman, Rick; Klein, Mark (2002). Evaluating Software Architecture: Methods and Case Studies. Boston: Addison Wesley Professional. pp. 241–242. ISBN 0-201-70482-X.

External links

Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs

This software-engineering-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://enwiki.freddythechick.net/index.php?title=Active_reviews_for_intermediate_designs&oldid=4163004"