Rutherford v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

UK legal case

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by imported>Ffffrr at 10:59, 30 August 2024 (Importing Wikidata short description: "UK legal case"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)

This article needs to be updated. The reason given is: Adjudication. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (July 2024)

This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.
Find sources: "Rutherford v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2024)

(Learn how and when to remove this message)

Rutherford v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions is a case currently before the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The case concerns the application of the "bedroom tax" to a family who care for their disabled grandson who suffers from Potocki–Shaffer syndrome.^[1]

See also

Discretionary Housing Payment

References

^ "Supreme Court to decide on 'unlawful' bedroom tax". 23 February 2016.

External links

Royal Court of Justice judgment

Retrieved from "https://enwiki.freddythechick.net/index.php?title=Rutherford_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Work_and_Pensions&oldid=6193749"