Template:WikiProject Reliability/testcases
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
![]() | This is the template test cases page for the sandbox of Template:WikiProject Reliability. to update the examples. If there are many examples of a complicated template, later ones may break due to limits in MediaWiki; see the HTML comment "NewPP limit report" in the rendered page. You can also use Special:ExpandTemplates to examine the results of template uses. You can test how this page looks in the different skins and parsers with these links: |
__EXPECTUNUSEDTEMPLATE__
Test1
{{WikiProject Reliability|category=no |namespace=talk |reliability=generally reliable |rsp=Ars Technica}}
![]() | Reliability | |||
|
{{WikiProject Reliability/sandbox}}
![]() | Reliability | |||
|
Test2
{{WikiProject Reliability|category=no |namespace=talk}}
![]() | Reliability | |||
|
{{WikiProject Reliability/sandbox}}
![]() | Reliability | |||
|
Test3
{{WikiProject Reliability|category=no |discussion1=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248#RfC: Breitbart |discussion10=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 190#UPDATE: Breitbart Global News Syndicate - Reliability Dispute |discussion11=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 182#Breitbart again |discussion2=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 300#Citing breitbart.com for their "Never Trump" opinion |discussion3=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 268#Breitbart as a source for criticism of Wikipedia |discussion4=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 265#Breitbart News ... but hear me out |discussion5=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 231#Should Breitbart articles be given talkpage PRESS templates |discussion6=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 216#Breitbart News |discussion7=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 211#Is Breitbart.com reliable? |discussion8=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 208#Use of Breitbart on Alt-right |discussion9=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 199#Is Breitbart reliable for its own opinion. |discussions=yes |namespace=talk |reliability=deps |rfc=yes |rsp=Breitbart News |status2=spb}}
![]() | Reliability | |||
|
{{WikiProject Reliability/sandbox}}
![]() | Reliability | |||
|
Test case: Ars Technica
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Test case: The Babylon Bee
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|