English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Articles for deletion/Atul Purohit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Atul Purohit

Atul Purohit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an autobiography that was deleted and (re)created several times. The problem is the WP:NOTABILITY. None of the sources cited is what we call reliable independent sources with significant coverage. All are personal or promotional pages, pages about his book(s), not about himself. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete because of no WP:NOTABILITY established here and plus, I didn't find any media coverage of this person. I also suspect that this article could be an autobiography or a case of WP:COI because the username of the user who created this article is similar with the name of the subject here. Ayub407talk 12:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete: Of the links offered in the article, only the DNA India piece might stand as a reference, but that is merely an unbylined two-paragraph piece on the subject as a student who writes/self-publishes. I also found another DNA India piece ("Duped Amdavadi Writer Opens Own Publishing House"  – via HighBeam (subscription required) ) but neither of these is sufficient for biographical notability, whether as WP:AUTHOR or more broadly. AllyD (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete, per nom. Reads like a (self)promotion piece. Kierzek (talk) 17:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete a writer who has not had enough coverage to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:21, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.