English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Articles for deletion/CoreLogic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 20:26, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

CoreLogic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not show any particular notability. Just another business. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:39, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Keep - I created this article in October 2010, and have only made 2 edits since, to fix a miscapitalization and put in their 2012 revenue last year. The article that is there now looks very different from the one I wrote, although through the lens of hindsight if I could do it again I'd have summarized the extremely detailed product list I first included. CoreLogic is a gigantic real estate data firm, with the largest real estate databases in the country.[[1]] Their 2014 revenue was $1.4B.[[2]] I'll add this and more info when I have time.Timtempleton (talk) 18:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Stub and Keep Remove the junk sources and promotion, leaving a stub. A company with more than $1 billion is clearly "worthy of notice" and I do see some sources in Google Books[3][4] and local publications.[5][6] CorporateM (Talk) 01:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:43, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep - this is a significant, well-known company. References show notability.--Rpclod (talk) 04:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep per WP:GNG and WP:LISTED. VMS Mosaic (talk) 08:58, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.