English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Articles for deletion/Fool proof campaign

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Fool proof campaign

Non-notable school project with no sourcing. Entirely original research. Newsaholic (talk) 00:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Comment Just added an {{articleissues}} with ~~about 5~~ four params, and also an {{uncategorized}} Thin boy 00 @197, i.e. 03:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete--WP is not a repository for school assignments (or it shouldn't be, anyway). Drmies (talk) 05:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete - To quote the article, "A Wikipedia page will be launched in correlation from the site to enable students to find out more information on the Fool Proof campaign. Sources will include studies used for the statistics along with documentation of the guerilla marketing and viral tactics used in the campaign." Whoever created this campaign appears to be unfamiliar with exactly what Wikipedia is and what Wikipedia is not. WP:COI issues, non-notable through independent resources, no verification of information, so comes off as WP:OR. -Verdatum (talk) 19:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete - probably could have been a speedy. Fails WP:CORP, WP:N and any other notability guideline this could possibly fall into. But really, I see this is WP:NOT. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy delete - it had been speedy deleted. No proofs of being notable. Dekisugi (talk) 08:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.