English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Articles for deletion/Grammatica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Grammatica

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This parser generator does not appear to be notable. I've only found two secondary sources (1 and 2) which discuss it, and only in passing. StereoFolic (talk) 02:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. StereoFolic (talk) 02:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete. I found other [1] sources that mention this parser generator, but not WP:SIGCOV. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 17:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete + Comment. Similarly to the previous two editors, I found little sourcing to indicate that this software is notable as a parser generator. In doing research into the topic, I found many similar parser generator stubs with varying degrees of notability which would likely qualify for deletion as well. However, I believe if might also be feasible for some of those stubs are merged with this list and this article to create a single "Parser Generator"/"Compiler-compiler"/"Complier Generator" page. KJGinger (talk) 17:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Agreed; I stumbled into this article from work I've been doing clearing out non-notable entries in Comparison of parser generators. I agree many of those stubs are similar situations to Grammatica here, but thought it would be good to float this article first for a little precedence before suggesting a bunch of similar articles. It seems like parser generators are a popular type of project for people and institutions to build, and many have been added to Wikipedia (often with COI) despite pretty clear lack of notability. StereoFolic (talk) 19:04, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.