English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Copyright problems/2008 August 5/Articles

Articles

Is there a reason why this submission is the User:EnglishRoth's only Wikipedia contribution ever? The article might be missing a few quotation marks which are to be added shortly, otherwise, the above misguided claim of the copyright violation can only be explained via his rather careless reading of both, the new article and one of a number of sources which confirm each other (in a similar manner) and the information provided thereof. --Poeticbent talk 01:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Addendum. The article is now rewritten from scratch to dissipate any suspicion of copyright infringement. --Poeticbent talk 06:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Article was deleted under WP:CSD#G12. A new article is located at Anna Borkowska (Sister Bertranda). --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
I came upon this while investigating an older copyvio. I have notified the contributor, who claims to be the webmaster, of the steps necessary to verify permission. Since he doesn't log in often, I have also contacted the webmaster of the website directly for verification of permission. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Sadly, my e-mail to the webmaster bounced twice. This is dependent, then on the return of the contributor. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Should be cleared soon. Webmaster sent permission to Communications Committee on August 6. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
No word yet from the Communications Committee. Given assertion of verification sent, giving it a few more days. Note resolution other than deletion here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Received and logged! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Already cleaned. Have warned contributor. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedily deleted in spite of incomplete assertion of permission. (Seems likely that creator is website owner and might have verified if pointed to WP:IOWN. New article in place that does not infringe...on text, anyway. Some image concerns addressed at commons. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Revised. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)