English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Copyright problems/2011 January 11

11 January 2011

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-01-11 Edit {{Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2011-01-11 }}

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Quite a mess! Thanks for taking care of it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

:*  Copyright concerns remain. Article deleted, left CUP notice. Except it was the section, not the article, deleted. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. But have left CUP notice for the contributor. (less confusing than the note above. :)) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:12, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  •  N This listing is redundant, as the article is on January 14th. I'm leaving it for there, because it is quite jargon heavy and it would be ever so much better if the creator rewrote it than for me, who knows jack about it, to do it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  • From "Ancient geography and recent archaeology: Dhanyawadi, Vesali and Mrauk-u.", Bob Hudson Archaeology Department, University of Sydney, Australia, 2005. [1] --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:53, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Silent Witness (history · last edit) from http://www.tv.com/silent-witness/show/3983/summary.html. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
    I think this one belongs to Wikipedia. The site TV.com (the apparent source) is a user-editable site also, and looking at early revisions of the article on WP shows a clear evolution of the text of the offending section into its present state. For example, this diff is from the creation to two-and-a-half years later, and the offending words are beginning to appear, but are clearly not being pasted in wholesale. Over the course of the following year we have only these small changes and then in the course of three edits User:Necrothesp (long-standing editor even then) makes three edits thus, taking us to a familiar form, in a clearly evolutionary manner. I think the problem is actually at TV.com in this case to where somebody has copied WP's info in. I'll ping Carl Sixsmith, and remove the copyio tag in a day or so. Splash - tk 22:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
    Cheers for the help Splash, I didn't realise that TV.com was user contributed. I agree it looks like the copying is the opposite way. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 20:54, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
    Ok, good. I've removed the tag. Splash - tk 14:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Častimir Timothy Majić (history · last edit) from http://www.croatianfranciscans.org/eng/news.htm (based on googling the phrase "and those he inspired to learn the Croatian language, history and heritage" from the middle of the article. Nomination completed by VWBot (talk) 00:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. What we've got now looks like an A7 candidate. :/ --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  • I've manually relisted this one from SCV, since permission is plausible but the blanking was delayed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)