English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Copyright problems/2012 April 14

14 April 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-04-14 Edit {{Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2012-04-14 }}

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Copyvio section has been 86'ed by User:Nyttend; no further action appears to be necessary. Deor (talk) 19:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Saristu (history · last edit) from http://www.saristu.eu/project/. I have tagged the article twice as the lede is from one page of the saristu website and the other section is from another page from the same website. The topic itself is worthy of an article; it's a shame that this is a word-for-word copy of the web pages in question. YSSYguy (talk) 08:32, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
  •   User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. I'm not sure why this was tagged in this way instead of using the typical copyright problem procedure, but relisting accordingly. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Unacceptably close paraphrasing + verbatim chunks. Material removed and note left on talk page. The source was http://www.animeboston.com/about/history/. Material added with this edit but at various points was removed and re-added. Is RevDel worth it? --Voceditenore (talk) 17:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Voceditenore (talk) 09:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Source was Robbins and Cotran, Pathologic Basis of Disease, Professional Edition, 8th ed. (Copyright © 2009 Saunders, An Imprint of Elsevier). See talk page for more. --Voceditenore (talk) 14:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
  •   No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. Article consists of extremely lengthy plot summary. No evidence of it appearing anywhere on the internet. Writing style also indicates a non-professional writer... to say the least! --Voceditenore (talk) 14:50, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
  •   Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Nothing left from that source, but found and removed a section copied from another source. See talk page. --Voceditenore (talk) 09:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

End. MER-C 03:30, 16 April 2012 (UTC)