Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. This looks like a potential CCI in the making. I've left a strong warning. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 19:25, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Issue resolved. Didn't find anything that was a concern here although I did re-write one sentence, which although I don't think it was a problem, was closer to the source than it needed to be. --Dpmuk (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Note that Gabriel Cousens was drastically condensed by other editors and I no longer think there are any significant close paraphrasing issues. Ocaasit | c 19:58, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I'd agree that this has changed significantly enough that any concerns about your contributions should be gone. --Dpmuk (talk) 20:58, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
I think this is largely fine but I've let Ocaasi know that there are two sentences which I think could do with a re-write although they're probably border line cases. Dpmuk (talk) 18:29, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Have just rewrote those two sentences myself --Dpmuk (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm requesting a review of articles I recently wrote after some editors expressed concerns about close paraphrasing.
This looks largely good to me. I've removed a couple of sentences that I thought were too closely paraphrased and asked Ocaasi if they are willing to re-write one paragraph. If that's done I think the close paraphrase tag can go. I also have a slight concern about the number of quotes used but given that this is the sort of person where we need to be reporting their views I don't think this aspect needs urgent attention. Dpmuk (talk) 16:35, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
