As it has been pointed out that I have a conflict of interest, I recuse myself from any further discussion regarding whether the “digital mailroom” article is or is not a copyright violation. Thank you! Bwrs (talk) 13:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
OTRS pending – an OTRS agent has indicated on the article’s talk page that a ticket has been received from the original author of the article. --Bwrs (talk) 18:48, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. While the letter is not an ordinary release, it is confirmation that the person who placed it is the copyright holder, which makes his placement of it here subject to our terms of use. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 00:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. It's quite possible, but with only two sources that clearly follow the placement of the article in the text, I';m afraid we can't determine much. :/ The article was cleaned of copyright issues once, but at this point all I can really do is note the concerns at the talk page in case somebody finds the source or decides to just rewrite it into a decent article. :) --Moonriddengirl(talk) 00:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Backwardscopy. Tag and explanation placed at talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. While the letter is not an ordinary release, it is confirmation that the person who placed it is the copyright holder, which makes his placement of it here subject to our terms of use. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. It's quite possible, but with only two sources that clearly follow the placement of the article in the text, I';m afraid we can't determine much. :/ The article was cleaned of copyright issues once, but at this point all I can really do is note the concerns at the talk page in case somebody finds the source or decides to just rewrite it into a decent article. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)