English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Sockpuppet investigations/Martin.musatov/Archive

User:Martin.musatov

Martin.musatov (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Martin.musatov

Martin.musatov (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Report date April 12 2009, 09:58 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Q T C


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
  • Note additional obvious evidence at [1]. He coerced innocent user User:Otisjimmy1 into adding a reference on his behalf at User talk:Otisjimmy1. He created a page Talk:P_=_NP_problem/Comments where he tried to use editsemiprotected to get another innocent user to edit on his behalf. He uploaded the diagram File:NPCclosed.gif at Commons describing his original research, which I deleted. He's created a number of copy-paste forks that he then adds his reference to, such as AH (complexity) (which I also deleted). Dcoetzee 10:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • See also [2], in which he removed a comment by me contesting his reference with a different sock, with edit comment "Correction amended anonymously per U.S. Bill of Rights".
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Blocked User:Anonymousone2 as probable sock William M. Connolley (talk) 20:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

  Clerk note:: Martin.musatov (talk · contribs) and Anonymousone2 (talk · contribs) indef'd, Anonymousacademic (talk · contribs) remains unblocked although evidence is suggestive. Avruch T 18:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

  • Hrm, to be honest, I find the evidence conclusive. He signed his name "Martin Michael Musatov" on his user page. Dcoetzee 20:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Yeah, conclusive is probably more accurate. I just get into the hang of saying "suggestive" on SPI, bit of a clerical weasel word I guess. Avruch T 20:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I blocked Anonymousacademic for this reason and more. Time to close. Valley2city 06:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Conclusions
  This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Everything has been indef blocked, though I haven't touched the IP (not enough recent activity to require a block) Valley2city 06:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


03 June 2010
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by User:Nsk92

User:Luke18:2-8 has attempted[3] to add to the David Eppstein article a link to a private letter addressed to Martin Musatov. Also, User:Luke18:2-8 edited the pages P (complexity) and Talk:P versus NP problem. These topics are the subjects of editing by User:Martin.musatov and his socks, e.g. [4][5], etc. Nsk92 (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Re Amalthea: Strange, the link to the PDF file[6] that Luke18:2-8 added to the Eppstein article works fine for me. It contains a scanned pdf file of a letter from the UC university officials to Martin Musatov regarding a complaint that he filed with them. In any event, I think that User:Luke18:2-8 does need to be blocked. Subsequent to the filing of this SPI report, there were more instances of disruptve editing by him, such as [7][8][9]. Nsk92 (talk) 00:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Seems it had a problem with hotlinking, it kept redirecting me to some page explaining server errors, until I visited the main index page. I see now that the whole domain is Martin Musatov's. Amalthea 09:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
Current status –   Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by Nsk92 (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Luke did use an obvious sock when trying to get the article unprotected, Brownbannister (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). Anything regarding Martin.musatov will necessarily be   Stale though, so you'd have to go with behavioral evidence. Personally, I don't really see it, but that pdf link isn't working for me. Amalthea 00:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
After a long look into some of the long-term issues on the related pages, the Luke18:2-8 account is blocked for disruption. Amalthea 09:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
  This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

07 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

New contributor who signed as M.M Musatov here [10]. Has created an article about prime numbers, which according to User:PrimeHunter is a continuation of past behaviour (explanation here). Checkuser presumably not necessary. Thanks, Physics is all gnomes (talk) 15:16, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  • Resueman blocked as a self-proclaimed sock. Amalthea 15:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)