English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Sockpuppet investigations/Martin.musatov/Archive
User:Martin.musatov
- Martin.musatov (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Martin.musatov
- Martin.musatov (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date April 12 2009, 09:58 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Anonymousone2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Anonymousacademic (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- This 3RR report
- Their edit histories of P_=_NP_problem
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
- Note additional obvious evidence at [1]. He coerced innocent user User:Otisjimmy1 into adding a reference on his behalf at User talk:Otisjimmy1. He created a page Talk:P_=_NP_problem/Comments where he tried to use editsemiprotected to get another innocent user to edit on his behalf. He uploaded the diagram File:NPCclosed.gif at Commons describing his original research, which I deleted. He's created a number of copy-paste forks that he then adds his reference to, such as AH (complexity) (which I also deleted). Dcoetzee 10:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- See also [2], in which he removed a comment by me contesting his reference with a different sock, with edit comment "Correction amended anonymously per U.S. Bill of Rights".
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Blocked User:Anonymousone2 as probable sock William M. Connolley (talk) 20:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Clerk note:: Martin.musatov (talk · contribs) and Anonymousone2 (talk · contribs) indef'd, Anonymousacademic (talk · contribs) remains unblocked although evidence is suggestive. Avruch T 18:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hrm, to be honest, I find the evidence conclusive. He signed his name "Martin Michael Musatov" on his user page. Dcoetzee 20:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Everything has been indef blocked, though I haven't touched the IP (not enough recent activity to require a block) Valley2city‽ 06:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
03 June 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
- Luke18:2-8 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by User:Nsk92
User:Luke18:2-8 has attempted[3] to add to the David Eppstein article a link to a private letter addressed to Martin Musatov. Also, User:Luke18:2-8 edited the pages P (complexity) and Talk:P versus NP problem. These topics are the subjects of editing by User:Martin.musatov and his socks, e.g. [4][5], etc. Nsk92 (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Re Amalthea: Strange, the link to the PDF file[6] that Luke18:2-8 added to the Eppstein article works fine for me. It contains a scanned pdf file of a letter from the UC university officials to Martin Musatov regarding a complaint that he filed with them. In any event, I think that User:Luke18:2-8 does need to be blocked. Subsequent to the filing of this SPI report, there were more instances of disruptve editing by him, such as [7][8][9]. Nsk92 (talk) 00:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- Seems it had a problem with hotlinking, it kept redirecting me to some page explaining server errors, until I visited the main index page. I see now that the whole domain is Martin Musatov's. Amalthea 09:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- Re Amalthea: Strange, the link to the PDF file[6] that Luke18:2-8 added to the Eppstein article works fine for me. It contains a scanned pdf file of a letter from the UC university officials to Martin Musatov regarding a complaint that he filed with them. In any event, I think that User:Luke18:2-8 does need to be blocked. Subsequent to the filing of this SPI report, there were more instances of disruptve editing by him, such as [7][8][9]. Nsk92 (talk) 00:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
- Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below. Requested by Nsk92 (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Luke did use an obvious sock when trying to get the article unprotected, Brownbannister (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Anything regarding Martin.musatov will necessarily be Stale though, so you'd have to go with behavioral evidence. Personally, I don't really see it, but that pdf link isn't working for me. Amalthea 00:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- After a long look into some of the long-term issues on the related pages, the Luke18:2-8 account is blocked for disruption. Amalthea 09:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
07 April 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Resueman (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
New contributor who signed as M.M Musatov here [10]. Has created an article about prime numbers, which according to User:PrimeHunter is a continuation of past behaviour (explanation here). Checkuser presumably not necessary. Thanks, Physics is all gnomes (talk) 15:16, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Resueman blocked as a self-proclaimed sock. Amalthea 15:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)