English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Suspected sock puppets/Alpha2002
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
User:Alpha2002
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Alpha2002 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
92.62.160.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
195.112.192.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
IamV (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Orlady (talk) 19:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- Evidence
These four accounts are engaged in what appears to be a coordinated effort to remove negative content about the unaccredited Rochville University. Tactics include identifying it as a legitimate school, creating confusion with University of La Rochelle, or deleting the Rochville article in a manner that suggested this was a Wikipedia administrative action, and making legal threats against its re-creation. This diff is one of a series in which Alpha2002 attempted to sanitize the Rochville article. In this diff, 195.112.192.2 tried to represent Rochville as a French school called "La Rochville." This diff by 92.62.160.3 is similar. In this diff, 92.62.160.3 attempted to rename University of La Rochelle to "La Rochville." This diff by 195.112.192.2 is similar. In this diff, 92.62.160.3 replaced the Rochville article with a statement that the article had been deleted due to pending litigation. In this diff, 195.112.192.2 deleted most of the article and made a legal threat against recreation of the deleted content. (That user was blocked for a short time following that edit.) This recent diff by newly registered user IamV replaced the Rochville article with a statement that the article had been deleted due to pending litigation, but did not make a legal threat.
- Comments
- Conclusions
All very clear, well done on an excellent report. Both registered accounts blocked indefinitely and IPs blocked 2 weeks. Rudget (review) 19:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)