English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Articles for deletion/86 400

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

86 400

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creep^Talk 17:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Rejected at Afc as being as an advertisement. Native advertising. scope_creep^Talk 17:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

weak keep: I was the one who accepted the AFC, however I concede that there is a possibility that the secondary sources which cover it are paid publicity. I accepted it on balance as the subject is a licensed deposit-taking organization, however that should not be given much weight in the scheme of things. --Salimfadhley (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

The sources included are not native advertising, but earned and organic editorial – including a mixture of local, national and international reliable secondary sources, plus the Australian banking regulator's own website (APRA). If there are any of the sources which you think don't meet the requirements, please let me know and I can see if there are more appropriate ones available. −− Gumption59

Comment Review of references:

[1] Neobank with 110 staff targets $2b in mortgages. standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage, such as: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH

[2]. standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage, such as: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH

[3] UK financial entrepreneur Anthony Thomson is launching a new digital bank in Australia. simple listings or compilations, such as: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH

[4] Metro Bank founder joins digital challengers in Australia. simple listings or compilations, such as: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH

[5]] New retail bank 86 400 rattles tin for fresh equity. standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage, such as: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH

The other five references are exactly the same. Standard announcements for a startup. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creep^Talk 13:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Delete I agree with the analysis of references above, none meet the criteria for establishing notabilty. I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 02:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Delete: Article does not have needed WP:SIGCOV directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 12:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.