English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Articles for deletion/Fun Fun Pingu
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Fun Fun Pingu
- Fun Fun Pingu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find video game sources: "Fun Fun Pingu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
Contested PROD. Non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources (WP:VRS), such as WP:VG/RS. No meaningful hits in custom RS search. Usual suspects for review lists do not have any. A quick search in magazines of the time does not bring up any hits. The game's local to Japan, there's no article on JPWP and I'm unable to search in Japanese, but I believe there isn't significant local coverage either. Lack of sources means there is not enough material to write a meaningful article without WP:PLOT and WP:GAMECRUFT and with WP:WAF in mind. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 18:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 18:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. (Could have just let the PROD expire to avoid this...) Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search and no reviews listed in MobyGames or any review aggregator. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 18:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. per nom. Definitely fails WP:GNG. Also falls foul of WP:NOTGUIDE. Class455fan1 (talk) 20:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I did find a Famitsu review and an article by IGN, but nothing else - doesn't seem like enough.--IDVtalk 10:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as none of this satisfies the video game notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.