English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Articles for deletion/Pirates@home

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:36, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Pirates@home

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fails WP:N and is unsourced except for the official website. An IP on the talk page even asked, "Is this notable enough for an encyclopedia?" Joe Chill (talk) 17:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete - Product doesn't seemed to have gained media attention, as I didn't find any sources on both Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister talk 20:57, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete as per the other non-notable research projects being cleaned up. Perhaps a mention could be made in the Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing article. But the project seems almost a joke, as it says on the web page: "...we are just having fun testing BOINC." W Nowicki (talk) 17:54, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

I should add the {{BOINC projects}} needs to have a thorough cleaning, removing all the red links. W Nowicki (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete no indication of notability;only one reference which is a 1st partyCurb Chain (talk) 05:17, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete as failing all tests of notability. Even the official site is now a deadlink. BusterD (talk) 23:19, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.