English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Articles for deletion/Private (Java)
From English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Private (Java)
- Private (Java) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a textbook. All non-textbook content is redundant with Java keywords and Java syntax Selket Talk 21:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Agree that the article as such is unsuitable. However it is not redundant either, Data encapsulation is a distinct topic, which is passingly mentioned at separation of concerns and at information hiding but not really covered at either. I suggest the article be Renamed to Data encapsulation and made non-language specific. Regards, Ben Aveling 21:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Done. Absent objections, or further comments, I suggest this be closed. Regards, Ben Aveling 23:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, likewise I agree the article Data encapsulation should be kept which is where this article is now a re-direct to. Mathmo Talk 04:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. The current article needs cleanup, but has moved to a broader and notable topic. Vassyana 07:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep new article. I'm surprised there wasn't already an article on this. –Pomte 09:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.