English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Articles for deletion/SyntheticPages (2nd nomination)
From English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to ChemSpider. merge as appropriate Spartaz Humbug! 06:44, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
SyntheticPages
AfDs for this article:
The given page title was invalid or had an inter-language or inter-wiki prefix.
It may contain one or more characters that cannot be used in titles.
- SyntheticPages (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Notability - The ref and links are are primary sources. There's no secondary source. Widefox (talk) 11:13, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Fails WP:WEB - Commercial site (seeking advertising) Widefox (talk) 01:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. On basis of good provenance. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:43, 17 November 2011 (UTC).
- Do you have any proof of provenance? We work on verifiability here. Widefox (talk) 00:49, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Royal Society of Chemistry is pretty good provenance. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:59, 22 November 2011 (UTC).
- Merge into Royal Society of Chemistry and/or ChemSpider. It doesn't appear to meet criteria in WP:WEB (but I fail so see how the above "Commercial site (seeking advertising)" argument is relevant here). Even if the database isn't notable enough for a standalone article, the article's current content is valuable and relevant to both the Royal Society of Chemistry and ChemSpider. ChemNerd (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:41, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Merge into ChemSpider. ditto ChemNerd's reasoning. ~ Lhynard (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Merge into ChemSpider, with a small section on it also in Royal Society of Chemistry, where it seems to be not mentioned. --Bduke (Discussion) 21:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Merge / redirect as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.