English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Articles for deletion/Zloadr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Zloadr

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another crypto article that doesn’t meet GNG. Little in the way of reliable sources and certainly nothing independent and in depth to satisfy notability criteria. Praxidicae (talk) 13:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Delete The only reliable non-primary, non-PR, and non-cryptocurrency news source currently cited is this article in the Evening Standard. They noted that it was "the brothers’ first newspaper interview" and "Update [28 December 2018]: Representatives of 50 Cent have contacted the Evening Standard to say that 50 Cent is not a friend of Sam and Steve Williams. We are happy to update matters." Џ 17:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete per above - David Gerard (talk) 10:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete currently cryptocurrencys are a dime a dozen, must show more coverage than currently shown to be notable. VViking_TalkEdits 15:05, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete

Keep The article has been re-written. Non-cryptocurrency news, non-primary and Reliable sources have been researched and incorporated into the article to pass GNG, like this article in the Evening Standard, which notes that "the brothers’ first newspaper interview" and "Update [28 December 2018]: Representatives of 50 Cent have contacted the Evening Standard to say that 50 Cent is not a friend of Sam and Steve Williams. We are happy to update matters" as noted by Џ and other sources like The Guardian, Daily Express, ProgrammableWeb among others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopher Odhiambo (talk • contribs) 00:35, 4 February 2019 (UTC) — Christopher Odhiambo (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Above is from article creator, SPA banned for spamming - David Gerard (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Keep The article is relevant and references are clearly visible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.52.36.59 (talk) 18:37, 4 February 2019 (UTC) — 51.52.36.59 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Comment this IP has only Contributed to this AfD and the related AfD for Sam Enrico Williams so this vote could very well be a WP:SOCK vote. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 01:13, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

~~Keep. Meets GNG now per sources shown by Christopher Odhiambo.~~ Ericwestbrook (talk) 22:50, 5 February 2019 (UTC) — Ericwestbrook (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

@Ericwestbrook highly recommend you read WP:SOCK. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

WP:SOCKSTRIKE. --K.e.coffman (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Delete Does not meet the pertinent inclusion guidelines. Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:05, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete as corporate spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete. Not a single significant RS to support notability (never mind several). Based on SOCK activity above, will need SALTING.Britishfinance (talk) 19:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Concur on need for salting - David Gerard (talk) 10:58, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.