English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Copyright problems/2010 November 11

Add links
From English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick

11 November 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-11-11 Edit {{Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2010-11-11 }}

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Rural Development Academy (history · last edit) from http://www.rda.gov.bd/. Chaosdruid (talk) 01:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. This was foundational; the website was cited, so that proves it predates. Later it was compounded with additional pasting. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:49, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Green tickY Blanked and relisted pending a complete rewrite; it is still clearly a derivative work. See talk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

List of tourist attractions in Aurangabad district (history · last edit) from http://welcomeindiatravel.com/travel_destination_india/Aurangabad.html. Chaosdruid (talk) 02:58, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

  • User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:36, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Jenny Morris (musician). I'm reporting concerns of copy violation raised by User:124.176.58.238 on my talkpage and later on Talk:Jenny Morris (musician). As indicated on those pages, I don't fully understand the nature of the complaint nor can I tell where in the article any problems remain. I have provided sources for some information that User:124.176.58.238 deleted but can't see how they relate to a copy violation. Could anyone please have a look at the article, its history and determine whether there are any actual copy violations which should be deleted?shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 09:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. This seems to have been based on a misunderstanding of copyright law and what is protected by it. So far as I have been able to determine, what is under dispute is the basic biographical facts used in the article and not any creative expression. In addition to a note at the talk page, I've left one for the IP and watchlisted both pages in case further clarification is necessary. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Statement of permission added on webpage and noted on talk page (by Bflorio12‎ (talk · contribs)). — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Now licensedat website. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:32, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. While the earlier content was a clear vio, the rewrite was a bit more borderline. Still, it very closely followed in structure and retained some striking language. I have removed it again; there is an offer at the talk page to rewrite, which hopefully will result in usable text! Meanwhile, I've tagged the impages NPD and written his representative to verify. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. The site is down for maintenance, but google cache saved the day. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:14, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
  • ? I don't find any sign of copied content in a quick snippet check or a mechanical check. No source was given by the tagger. The sources for this content are inaccessible, but there's no compelling reason to believe this is a copyvio that I can see. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Red XN No source identified; no examples given. Could not find a source myself, and content is very basic. Tag removed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:22, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://enwiki.freddythechick.net/index.php?title=English_Wikipedia_@_Freddythechick:Copyright_problems/2010_November_11&oldid=6920096"