English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Copyright problems/2011 May 23

From English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick

23 May 2011

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-05-23 Edit {{Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2011-05-23 }}

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Cleaned previously. --NortyNort (Holla) 12:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Originally added here in 2008. Website had a different URL then of which archives in 2007 show we copied from them. --NortyNort (Holla) 12:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Al-Saddiq Al-Raddi (history · last edit) from [1]. Originally tagged G12 but the original author (now blocked for their username) has an user name linking them to the source and given the IPs addition are from the same source it seems likely the IP editor is the same user (or at least from the same organisation). As such they may hold copyright and be willing to license the text so listing here to give them a chance to do so. Dpmuk (talk) 20:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Old revision restored, cclean template on talk may help future material donors.--NortyNort (Holla) 13:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
    • Re-tagged. This is still too close to the source in my opinion. The second and third sentences of the first paragraph are identical to the source, while the first sentence and a half of the second paragraph is also identical with the last half of the second paragraph only slightly different. In my opinion if permission isn't forthcoming this needs deleting. Dpmuk (talk) 14:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
      • I removed the rest. I missed checking back that far. I couldn't find an old archive of that page but it seems we copied from them.--NortyNort (Holla) 21:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Addition began here, old version restored. --NortyNort (Holla) 02:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. --NortyNort (Holla) 02:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
  • A lot of the article comes from here, some quoted, some not. Since this is a federal court paper, is it PD?--NortyNort (Holla) 02:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes; court judgments of any court are PD under US law. Will attribute. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. Suspicious. Also nearing a PROD expiration. --NortyNort (Holla) 02:58, 1 June 2011 (UTC)