English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Copyright problems/2012 March 29

From English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick

29 March 2012

Bot flagged articles

SCV for 2012-03-29 Edit {{Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2012-03-29 }}

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
The formulation “Author’s Certificate” was first written into Law of the Russian Federation in 1919, see Patent Law of RF, 1919 (Декрет СНК РСФСР от 30.06.1919 “Об изобретениях (Положение)”) by Government of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic: Vladimir Lenin, Vladimir Bonch-Bruyevich and Secretary of Government of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic: Л. ФОТИЕВА. In 1926 the Law was rescinded. The formulation was restored in 1931 in Law of the USSR. The Patent Law of Russia (1919) is original source for determination “Author’s Certificate”. Article about “Author’s Certificate” was published in Great Soviet Encyclopedia only in 1926, it was the second source. USSR Government ordered the publication of Great Soviet Encyclopedia in 1925. I.A. Gringol'ts did not show the original source in his article “Author’s Certificate” in Great Soviet Encyclopedia, because in that time all properties belong to the Government, it was as the tradition (de-facto) and the Law. I.A. Gringol'ts was not author of the formulation of “Author’s Certificate” and he was not member of Russian Government in 1919.
Resume: Article User:Inventcreat/Author’s Certificate (Variant 1) has not been broken any copyright. User:Inventcreat — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.191.4 (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
  • The article has been deleted as it demonstrably copies from the 1979 Great Soviet Encyclopedia - including "form 2." Please write articles in your own words except in keeping with Wikipedia:Copy-paste. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I couldn't see the source in full there, but confirmed copying through snippet google searches. I also found content copied from at least two books. Looks like this was a pastiche of copied content. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:18, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
  • User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. --Dpmuk (talk) 00:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Article redirected to a non-infringing target. Deleted and redirected by others. Redirect seems to be to a different person but also seems a valid redirect. --Dpmuk (talk) 00:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 00:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 00:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Yup. Close paraphrasing. Scrubbed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:47, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
  • ? I haven't found any matched content, so it's possible that Sven Manguard has finished rewriting this. I've asked him. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:06, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
  • He says he has not finished rewriting but will do so in May. I'm uncertain at this point how extensive the issue is but discussing with him whether or not the remaining content should be blanked pending rewrite. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:17, 22 April 2012 (UTC)