English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Files for deletion/2013 February 14

< February 13	February 15 >

February 14

File:National Premier Leagues logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by John Vandenberg (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Replaced by other file and no longer in use. 2nyte (talk) 04:20, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nikki-Heat-all-covers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Nyttend's and Diego's conditions have not been met. A hypothetical fair use claim can not be considered. Chick Bowen 16:16, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Derivative work of copyright covers. Not the uploaders to licence. LGA ^{(was LightGreenApple)} _{talk to me} 10:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Keep. Looks like a reasonable claim of fair use could be made for the series article. Nyttend (talk) 14:05, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Then the uploader needs to make one and remove his claim to release it. LGA ^{(was LightGreenApple)} _{talk to me} 05:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Keep. I have used the covers, but I personally created the actual 'collage' of the covers. AlexKnightNZ 16:50, 15 February 2013

It's a derivative work and you don't own the copyright to the component images, if you remove your claim to ownership and make a Fair Use Rationale then I will withdraw the nomination. LGA ^{(was LightGreenApple)} _{talk to me} 05:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete The image is a gallery of multiple covers. Non-free galleries aren't allowed per WP:NFG. In the unlikely event that this indeed is own work by the uploader as claimed, then this needs to go through OTRS per WP:IOWN. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

This is not a gallery, it's a collage. In this case it seems justified for identification better than a gallery, as the article is about the whole series and not any single book. (The collage illustrates the common branding themes shared by all covers, and each cover is shown at less resolution because of this). This seems to be the rare case of which the policy is talking. Diego (talk) 18:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

A collage is obviously the same thing as a gallery. Sure, the wikicode is a little bit different, but the outcome looks the same. Additionally, WP:MONTAGE tells that "fair-use components are rarely appropriate, as each non-free image used in the creation of the montage contributes towards consideration of minimal use of non-free images". --Stefan2 (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Exactly, that's why I provided the reason why this is not the normal case but the rare one where it is appropriate. All rules in WP allow for exceptions, and this one explicitly mentions what is required. Diego (talk) 11:02, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete These images were taken official Richard Castle website and were resize and put together poster format like. Just put it into a collage doesn't mean own images. It just my thought on this. StarbriteQueen (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep under fair use for identification of the series, provided that proper copyright attribution is given for each individual cover.Diego (talk) 18:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PilotButte84 pilot butte bend oregon 10-01-84 med.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

A much lower resolution version of File:Pilot Butte, Bend, Oregon.jpg. This image is cropped from the other, so it's not eligible for F8 speedy deletion. Nyttend (talk) 14:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AFCW-Uniform-DEN.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 February 23#File:AFCW-Uniform-DEN.PNG. Chick Bowen 18:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Tagged with {{subst:rfu}}, but the tag was removed. This is a drawing of utilitarian objects (not copyrightable in the United States, see Commons:COM:UA) and logos which are either in the public domain (see Commons:COM:TOO) or de minimis. This can be replaced by a freely licensed image of the same clothes.

According to Special:PermanentLink/177152437, the initial file was a freely licensed drawing by Silent Wind of Doom (talk · contribs), but it seems that this drawing later was deleted per WP:CSD#F5 (which is not correct since F5 only applies to non-free files). Thus, this is replaceable by the initial revision of the file. I'm not sure how much later uploaders have changed or whether the differences between that file and the current one are below the threshold of originality or not. Stefan2 (talk) 14:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Why don't you just request an undeletion of the original file? F5 cases normally wouldn't qualify, but this is an unusual situation because of the possibility that it could be replaced with a deleted image. That way, you'll easily see that you were right or that you were wrong; no need for an FFD. Nyttend (talk) 14:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LP - Laprospettivadime.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Seemingly ranodm screenshot which violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

This is not a random screenshot, this scene is actually present in the video in question, between some others. K427 (talk) 21:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

A seemingly random screenshot from the music video, yes. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Indeed this was taken at random during the video, but there aren't many parts of the music video that would be suitable for an image, due to being heavily edited. Some of them are actually pictures of the singer in question depiced as a drawing and a heart with a sword in its middle while surrounded by flames. I do understand that this exact image does not show a lot related to what is said in the article, but as it is written there, "...it (the music video) shows images of the two gigs performed in Paris on March 22 and 23, alternating with images of the singer herself in many locations". I thought this could represent what is said there, that's why I uploaded it. K427 (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bharath gopi and Baby Shalini in Ente Mamattukkuttiyammakku.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

File fails Non-free content criteria. A non-free image is already used in Infobox which gives a clear understanding of the page. Sreejith K (talk) 21:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Landscape Plants Mahadin.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Violates the footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Stefan2 (talk) 22:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Please tell me what shall i do? Which type of licenses i have to use in this case? Freedom's Falcon 222 (talk) 01:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- You should make sure that it is not used in the article about the person but only in the article about the book. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.