English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2021 November 23

From English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Archive header with {{subst:Archive header.

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < November 22 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Oct | November | Dec >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


November 23

Relationship between a function's fixed points and roots?

Is there any connection between the zeros of a function and its fixed points? It almost seems as if there must be. (However to be quite honest I can't even articulate why I would think such a thing in the first place!) Earl of Arundel (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

For a given function, no. The fixed points of a function are exactly the zeroes of , and the zeroes of a function are exactly the fixed points of . So you can turn any "find a zero" problem into a "find a fixed point" problem and vice versa. —Kusma (talk) 17:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Ah, well of course. Thanks! Earl of Arundel (talk) 18:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Here is a connection that is more a curiosity than anything deep. Given a function defined on the reals and a real number , consider the following three propositions:
    (A)     is a fixed point of ;
    (B)     is a zero of ;
    (C)    .
If any two among these three propositions hold, so too does the third.  --Lambiam 22:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Interesting! Which trivially implies that any given polynomial function lacking any sort of constant term must also therefore have at least one fixed point at . It is a rather simple relationship as you say still pretty elegant... Earl of Arundel (talk) 00:22, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Searching for a root that way is called fixed point iteration fwiw. 2601:648:8202:350:0:0:0:69F6 (talk) 08:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Let be any function such that . Given function , define by Then a zero of is a fixed point of (but the converse is not necessarily true). This is a more general version of the schema given above by Kusma, which corresponds to the choice The larger generality can sometimes be used to achieve convergence in fixed-point iteration where the choice would diverge. See also Cobweb plot.  --Lambiam 10:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Neat! It's such a nice result. Does this theorem have a name? Here the function (blue) is used to construct a synthetic fixed point with (orance) precisely at the real root of (green), which in this case just happens to be 1/4. Earl of Arundel (talk) 00:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)