English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick:WikiProject Alberta/Assessment

Add links
From English Wikipedia @ Freddythechick

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Alberta/Navigation}} Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Alberta. We assess the quality and importance of Alberta related articles. Work is done with conjunction with the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, and the worklist is produced by WP 1.0 bot.

Articles are rated through template {{WikiProject Canada|class= |importance= |ab=yes}} on Alberta related article talk pages.

Statistics

{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Alberta articles by quality statistics}} {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Alberta/Assessment links}}

Article grading

<categorytree depth=1 style="float:right; clear=right; margin-left:1em; margin-right: 1ex; border:1px solid brown; padding:0.7ex; background-color:0xffffcc;">WikiProject Alberta articles</categorytree>

Quality scale

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

WikiProject article quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
 FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:{{Wikipedia:Featured article criteria}}
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Cleopatra
(as of June 2018)
 FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:{{Wikipedia:Featured list criteria}}
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
(as of May 2018)
 A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
{{Wikipedia:Content assessment/A-Class criteria|raw=yes}}
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River
(as of June 2014)
 GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria}}
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Discovery of the neutron
(as of April 2019)
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
{{Wikipedia:Content assessment/B-Class criteria|raw=yes}}
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Psychology
(as of January 2024)
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Wing
(as of June 2018)
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Ball
(as of September 2014)
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Lineage (anthropology)
(as of December 2014)
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of literary movements

Importance scale

Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top
{{Top-Class}}
Top 		The article is one of the core topics about Alberta. Generally, this is limited to general and overview articles about the province. A reader who is not involved in Alberta will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Alberta, Geography of Alberta, Calgary, Edmonton
High
{{High-Class}}
High 		The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding specific topics about Alberta or general topics about parts of Alberta Most readers will have some knowledge of at least part of the subject Articles at this level cover particular issues related to Alberta and overview articles of more detailed pages, specific terms are used to detail the topic Towns of Alberta, Tourism in Alberta, Premier of Alberta
Mid]
{{Mid-Class}}
Mid 		The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in Alberta. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand Alberta. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Alberta general election, 2004, C-Train, Bow River, Cold Lake
Low
{{Low-Class}}
Low 		The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Alberta, but may cover topics related to parts of the province. Few readers outside of Alberta or that are not within the local area of the article's topic may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of Alberta, or may be only marginally related to the province, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Hector Lake, Pilot Mountain, Mill Woods, Nose Hill Park

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Canada|ab=yes}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Canada| ... | importance=??? | ab=yes | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Index

{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Alberta articles by quality}}

Retrieved from "https://enwiki.freddythechick.net/index.php?title=English_Wikipedia_@_Freddythechick:WikiProject_Alberta/Assessment&oldid=175933"