Template:Music ratings/sandbox

Professional ratings
Review scores
Source	Rating

__EXPECTUNUSEDTEMPLATE__This is the template sandbox page for Template:Music ratings (diff).
See also the companion subpage for test cases.

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

This template is used on approximately 98,000 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them.

Only add a rating if you cite it with a reference. For further information on sources, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums. For the guide on transitioning from Infoboxes to AlbumRatings, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Moving infobox reviews into article space.

This template uses Lua:

Module:Music ratings (sandbox)

Professional ratings
Review scores
Source	Rating
AllMusic	^[1]
Rolling Stone	9/10^[2]

Instructions

This template provides a brief summary and overview of the critical consensus of song and album reviews. It is used to display only brief and objectively-verifiable ratings, such as "", "B+", or "7/10". It cannot capture the general sense of a review that does not include any kind of scale, so do not include language like "Very favorable" or "(mixed)" in the template, as this would be original research.

The template is not to be a substitute for a section in paragraph form, since a review can not be accurately boiled down to a simple rating out of five stars or other numeric score. If an article is lacking a reception section in prose, but the information is presented in table format, the |noprose=yes parameter can be used to tag the article as needing a reception section in prose.

This template is generally the first element after the heading for the section on Reception, Critical reception, Reviews, or something similar. If one of those sections is not present, the template should be placed immediately after the infobox, and can then be moved once a Reception section is present.

The reviews should be listed alphabetically in the Reviews field. The information in the reviewer field should be the name of the source (most commonly an online music service like AllMusic, or a music magazine like Rolling Stone—note that magazines are italicized). Don't forget to wikilink to the relevant article.

The information in the score field should be the rating given in the review (e.g. 4/5). The rating should use the same format as in the review, to portray the score of the review accurately. For star ratings you should use the star rating template; for example, entering {{Rating|4.5|5}}, will render: .

For reviews at AllMusic it is convenient to use the {{AllMusic}} template.

For review aggregators AnyDecentMusic? and Metacritic it is convenient to use the fields <syntaxhighlight lang="text" class="" style="" inline="1">ADM</syntaxhighlight> and <syntaxhighlight lang="text" class="" style="" inline="1">MC</syntaxhighlight> in the template, respectively.

For reviews from Robert Christgau's Consumer Guide you may use the Christgau rating template. For example, entering {{Rating-Christgau|dud}} will render: .

Note that the minus sign character (−) is not the same thing as a hyphen (-), so "B–", not "B-". They appear similar but you can use the proper character by inputting <syntaxhighlight lang="text" class="" style="" inline="1">−</syntaxhighlight> or using the <syntaxhighlight lang="text" class="" style="" inline="1">Insert</syntaxhighlight> menu that is available in the editing window on Wikipedia; it is located near other such arithmetic operators like <×> and <÷>.

After the rating should be the citation of the source of the review. Per Wikipedia:Citing sources do not add reviews without a citation. This means a properly formatted footnote, in most cases providing the author, date, and source, along with an external link if available. Do not use an embedded link with no information (e.g. link) as this promotes link rot and is inconsistent with Wikipedia's policy on embedded links. If you must use an embedded link, be sure to manually provide a full citation in the article's References section per Wikipedia:Citing sources.

Usage

Professional ratings
Review scores
Source	Rating

</syntaxhighlight>

Parameters

Required fields:

rev#: The name of the reviewer. It is recommended to include no more than 10 reviews , but you can add more in exceptional circumstances. For instance, a particularly popular song or album which has been re-released and has several prominent reviews over decades' time.
rev#score: The rating given by the reviewer.

All of the following fields are optional:

title: Can be used to provide a custom title for the table, otherwise, it will default to "Professional ratings".
subtitle: Used to add additional text before the collapsible section. This is necessary to add if want a longer title, as long titles via the "title" parameter will not center correctly.
width: Sets the width of the table; default is 24.2em, to match the width of the song and album infoboxes in most browsers and skins.
ADM: AnyDecentMusic? score.
MC: Metacritic score.
aggregate#: Name of a review aggregator.
aggregate#score: The rating given by the review aggregator.
noprose: Should only be used for articles that do not have a Reception section summarizing the reviews. If set to yes, will categorize articles into Category:Articles with music ratings that need to be turned into prose.

Example

For example, entering

Professional ratings
Aggregate scores
Source	Rating
Metacritic	69/100^[1]
Review scores
Source	Rating
AllMusic	^[2]
Q	^[3]
Robert Christgau	B^[4]

</syntaxhighlight>

will render

Professional ratings
Aggregate scores
Source	Rating
Metacritic	69/100^[1]
Review scores
Source	Rating
AllMusic	^[2]
Q	^[3]
Robert Christgau	B^[4]

and generate the following footnotes with the sources:

^ ^1.0 ^1.1 "Black Gives Way To Blue". Metacritic. Retrieved 2 September 2012. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Meta" defined multiple times with different content
^ ^2.0 ^2.1 Huey, Steve. Alice in Chains: Dirt > Review at AllMusic. Retrieved 31 January 2010.
^ ^3.0 ^3.1 Doe, Jane (February 2002). "Review: Dirt". Q. No. 65. p. 120. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Q" defined multiple times with different content
^ ^4.0 ^4.1 Christgau, Robert. "Review: Dirt". Robert Christgau. Retrieved 31 January 2010.

Tracking categories

Template data

This is the TemplateData for this template used by TemplateWizard, VisualEditor and other tools. See a monthly parameter usage report for Template:Music ratings in articles based on its TemplateData.

TemplateData for Music ratings

This template creates a table with reviews for songs and albums. Only add a rating if you cite it with a reference. The template is not to be a substitute for a section in paragraph form.

Template parameters[Edit template data]
This template prefers block formatting of parameters.
Parameter		Description	Type	Status
1st reviewer	`rev1`	The name of the first reviewer.	String	required
1st reviewer's rating	`rev1score` `rev1Score`	The rating given by the first reviewer.	String	required
2nd reviewer	`rev2`	The name of the second reviewer. More reviewers can be added with parameters in the format rev[#] (the next one would be rev3). It is recommended to include no more than 10 reviews, but more can be added in exceptional circumstances.	String	optional
2nd reviewer's rating	`rev2score` `rev2Score`	The rating given by the second reviewer. More ratings can be added with parameters in the format rev[#]score (the next one would be rev3score). It is recommended to include no more than 10 reviews, but more can be added in exceptional circumstances.	String	optional
3rd reviewer	`rev3`	no description	String	optional
3rd reviewer's rating	`rev3score` `rev3Score`	no description	String	optional
4th reviewer	`rev4`	no description	String	optional
4th reviewer's rating	`rev4score` `rev4Score`	no description	String	optional
5th reviewer	`rev5`	no description	String	optional
5th reviewer's rating	`rev5score` `rev5Score`	no description	String	optional
6th reviewer	`rev6`	no description	String	optional
6th reviewer's rating	`rev6score` `rev6Score`	no description	String	optional
7th reviewer	`rev7`	no description	String	optional
7th reviewer's rating	`rev7score` `rev7Score`	no description	String	optional
8th reviewer	`rev8`	no description	String	optional
8th reviewer's rating	`rev8score` `rev8Score`	no description	String	optional
9th reviewer	`rev9`	no description	String	optional
9th reviewer's rating	`rev9score` `rev9Score`	no description	String	optional
10th reviewer	`rev10`	no description	String	optional
10th reviewer's rating	`rev10score` `rev10Score`	no description	String	optional
AnyDecentMusic score	`ADM`	The AnyDecentMusic? score. Appears under the "Aggregate scores" header.	String	optional
Metacritic score	`MC`	The Metacritic score. Appears under the "Aggregate scores" header.	String	optional
1st review aggregator	`aggregate1`	The name of the first review aggregator.	String	optional
1st review aggregator's rating	`aggregate1score`	The rating given by the first review aggregator.	String	optional
2nd review aggregator	`aggregate2`	The name of the second review aggregator.	String	optional
2nd review aggregator's rating	`aggregate2score`	The rating given by the second review aggregator.	String	optional
Table title	`title`	A custom title for the table, replacing "professional ratings".	String	optional
Table subtitle	`subtitle`	Additional text before the collapsible section. This is necessary to add if you want a longer title, as long titles in the "title" parameter will not work right.	String	optional
Table width	`width`	The width of the table.	String	optional
Table align	`align`	The value is "left" if you want to place the table on the left. Auto value `left`	Line	optional
Article lacks prose section	`noprose`	Set to yes if there is just a single ratings template in the reception section and prose text is missing Auto value `yes`	Line	optional
Table state (collapse)	`state`	Automatically collapses the template and adds a "show" button. Suggested values `collapsed` Auto value `collapsed`	Line	deprecated